Women's Policy Coordinator, AMSA Gender & Sexuality Committee
Last week, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 3, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act
, a bill that creates new, harmful restrictions on reproductive health care. The Hyde Amendment already ensures that no taxpayer funding goes towards pregnancy termination; this bill goes beyond current law by raising taxes on small businesses
and the self-employed who wish to purchase a private insurance plan that includes abortion care.
Many of you out there in AMSA contacted your Representatives prior to the vote to tell them where you stand. Your voice will be needed as this bill moves on to the Senate as well. Before that goes down, there are five special, supposedly-moderate-formerly-pro-choice Representatives
I want to point out and encourage you to follow up with if you happen to be so lucky as to be their constituents. Reps. Judy Biggert and Bob Dold of Illinois, Reps Rodney Frelinghuysen and Leonard Lance of New Jersey, and Rep. Richard Hanna of New York all underwent serious makeovers to vote for this bill. These Reps ran on pro-choice platforms in the campaign last year but voted for this very anti-choice bill. I encourage you to call them to let them know how this makes you feel.
I'm particularly disappointed with my former Congresswoman, Rep. Judy Biggert (IL-13). She previously served as co-chair of the pro-choice caucus. I mean, how does one get that mixed up?
But, moving on - you might be saying, well, it's not like it's going to pass the Senate, right? And the President would veto it anyway. What's the big deal?
This bill was HR 3 - the third bill to get numbered when this new Congress came into session and clearly a priority of the majority party. After this bill was introduced, the budget battle over Planned Parenthood and its funding began. Those negotiations deferred the family planning funding issue for the time being but led to a deal that left the District of Columbia banned from using its own city funds
to support abortion care for low income women. Another bill introduced in the House, The Protect Life Act
(HR 358), seeks to expand conscious clause protections to apply to institutions and alters the obligation of referral/transfer (read: a woman with a miscarriage could present to an ER and be turned away if they thought she might have had an elective abortion and they're not comfortable completing it). Meanwhile another bill seeks to get rid of funding for comprehensive sex education
. This is a big deal.
These are things that will not go away the first time they are voted down. This is not about your tax money. It is a blatant attack on women's health and it is not just about abortion. By seeking to control basic sexual health education and access to family planning and preventive health the House of Representatives has made it clear that it finds itself to be more qualified than women to make important life decisions like when they're ready to be parents.
This ideological battle is far remove
d from the reality of women’s health care in this country. Reproductive health care is just that, health care. As a medical student, I want all of my patients to be supported by health care providers when they are in need. If you feel the same, I urge you to speak out against these policies as they progress. There are some champions in Congress who will be right there with you: